Rate Vegas

On June 19 2005, RateVegas.com User wrote:

Good show. Lots feathers, glitz and nakedness. Some of the dancers were superb. Surprised that so many of the dancers were nearly flatchested. One girl had NO boobs and she was so skinny you could see her ribs; no kidding. All in all a good show, but I have enjoyed others in Vegas more. Especially, Scintas and Clint Holmes.

On March 09 2005, RateVegas.com User wrote:

The costumes and the dancers wer beautiful, but both my husband and I were bored after the first half hour. Even the bare breasts were not enough for my husband to find it entertaining. I was very disappointed for the $70 tickets.

On October 01 2004, RateVegas.com User wrote:

Enjoyable show, beautiful costumes (and showgirls), great-looking sets, a classic Vegas show. Take the backstage tour, it’s worth it.

On June 25 2003, gazinto wrote:

This was a good “old-fashioned” Vegas show. Lots of beautiful costumes and backdrops. Worth it to see once. Don’t sit near the stage because you lose the effect of the whole show. Try to get center seats, even if they are further to the back. Showroom is big but not so big you can’t see.

On June 07 2003, bnsf600 wrote:

This is an old style song and dance Las Vegas show. I enjoyed
it as they had different song and dance routines mixed in
with a magician during the break. One of the song and dance
routines was based on the Titanic. The dancers are topless,
but I would have a hard time paying $50 to see this again. The
seating is assigned, so there is no need to tip the matre de
for better seats. I think drinks ran about $6 or $7, but I
do not think it was mandatory to purchase drinks.