Rate Vegas

On July 07 2006, RateVegas.com User wrote:

ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS !!

On March 10 2006, RateVegas.com User wrote:

They say not your typical cirque type show. They were right because it was nowhere as good as the rest. As far as the sexy side, it is not over the top. It acutually is done in a very provacative and interesting way, BUT

On July 06 2005, RateVegas.com User wrote:

I wasn’t offended by the sexual content, but was offended by the fact that Cirque Du Soleil allows their name to be placed on this show.

There was very little in the show that was worthy of the Cirque name and reputation for quality.

This was primarily a dance show and there are better dancers in many other shows in Vegas.

On June 27 2005, RateVegas.com User wrote:

We have been big Cirque du Soleil fans for many years (being Canadian) and have enjoyed ALL their Vegas shows since 1997. Also have seen their travelling shows throughout Canada in the summers. We LOVE Cirque. We are also a fun, open-minded late 20’s/early 30’s couple… this show was FUN for us. But not in a typical Cirque way. Yes, it is a DIFFERENT side of Cirque, but if you don’t take it too seriously or expect a huge production like O or KA, you just might have a laugh. Also, if you go with an open mind and an attitude as if you were going to an adventurous new night spot (in Paris maybe), you will get a kick out of it. This show is not for kids, nor is it for the prudish or sexually closed minded. Its nearly worth the price of admission to go and watch the reactions of the older and/or prudish people in the audience. We saw several older men in couples get offended part way through the show and stand up to leave (and drag their wives with them) when they saw two of the male performers kiss. FUNNY THOUGH, those same men didn’t storm out earlier when two of the female performers swam nearly naked together simulating much more intimate acts…hmmm the male psyche… go with your lover, go with an open mind and don’t pay for the couches or upgrade your seats. You won’t miss a thing from anywhere. Its a good time and a good value for what it is…. and it just might give you some ideas of what the two of you want to do later in the night. What happens in …. (that’s overused….. but have fun!)

On May 17 2005, RateVegas.com User wrote:

I expected more from cirque de soleil. This was a poor sex show with a couple of acrobats. I could have gone to a cararet show for a lot less money.

On August 02 2004, JBF wrote:

When they say “adults only” they mean it.. and it may not mean all adults. If you are easily offended or conservative about your views on sexuality, don’t go !! However, if you want to see a show that is somewhat a cross between burlesque and circus side show with a liberal helping of sexuality of all stripes (and I do mean all stripes), you’re in for a jolly good time. If you buy seats near the front, be prepared, you could be called onto the stage to be part of the human zoo.

On March 20 2004, sunny729 wrote:

As a former dancer I was pleased. This show is Beautiful. If you have sexually hang ups don’t go. If you are looking for clean cut family fun, you got the wrong ticket. But if you are a fan of the human body and all of it’s wonder you must see this show. My husband and I saw it 3/11 for our anniversery and we are still talking about it. We even downloaded the screen saver.lol This show delights in sex and all of it’s fun, wonderful, and beautiful parts. It talks of love in every color, shape and size. They invite you to join them, and make you laugh. It was like going to a very well hosted party. The only bad part was that it ended.

On March 10 2004, Hunter wrote:

‘Zumanity’ is Cirque de Soleil’s third permanent production show in Las Vegas, following the massively successful ‘Mystere’ and ‘O’. While ‘Zumanity’ shares much with its brethren down the street, it is a unique creation that can stand on its own.

The first thing you notice as you enter is the plush theater that has been converted for this production. Formerly housing Michael Flatley’s Irish dancers, the changes are dramatic.

‘Zumanity’ is similar to ‘Mystere’ in that the performers are the obvious focal point of the show. Compare this to ‘O’ where performers share the spotlight with an incredible production facility. At the same time, ‘Zumanity’ has a clear voice and flavor of its own – this is not your mother’s Cirque de Soleil.

Much has been made of the adult themes presented. It is clear that this show is not for those under 18… Beyond that, I don’t see what all the fuss is about. The content is by no means pornographic (not even close) or obscene. It is an interesting exploration of human sexuality combined with some amazing dance maneuvers. I don’t recommend this show to the prudish – you must be able to laugh at ‘dirty’ jokes to enjoy this show.

Are you looking for something different to see when you are in Las Vegas? Tired of magicians, comics, blue men and circus clowns? Already seen ‘Mystere’ and ‘O’ and interested in ‘another side of Cirque de Soleil’? I am willing to bet that you haven’t seen something like ‘Zumanity’ before…

On February 21 2004, choum wrote:

I would not recommend this show to anyone. Waste of time and money. Good aerial acts but that is all.

On November 14 2003, johninballard wrote:

I have never been so dissapointed. I have seen Mystere 4 times, “O” twice and every road show that comes to Seattle and was so looking forward to seeing Zumanity. I could not believe what I was seeing. I am far from a prude but the show lacked taste. Joey needs to go back to Greenwich Village and practice. There were several bright spots but all in all it was a major waste of time and money. Besides, after looking at the expensive program there were several acts we didn’t even get to see. Could also have done without the vaudvillian pilgrims and the preshow guy who thought he was gods gift to women. So save your money and go to a stip joint or The Thunder from Downunder.

Bring back the costumes, the tumblers and good taste…............

On November 05 2003, joe wrote:

Not only was this the biggest waste of time and money they should do everyone a major favor and close this show. It is NOT a work in progress as the LV media like to say, that is because they can not pump enough energy, entertainment value or creative ability into it. This dog just won’t hunt and should be put to rest.

On September 18 2003, brian9549 wrote:

This show is really for adults. I liked the fact that they kept the music and the action pumping (no pun intended). Have only seen other Cirque productions on TV but this one is well done. The MC is a little annoying but that dancing is good and the acrobats are amazing. The theme of the show is pleasure and sexual expression. I think that a lot of people go into this expecting a typical Cirque show and when they don’t get it they are disappointed. I went in not know what to expect and was pleasantly surprised.

On September 04 2003, icanjuggle wrote:

Lousy show by any standard. How a perverted and cheap show such as this could be produced by Cirque du Soliel and find it’s way into a major Las Vegas Hotel is beyond me. I felt embarassed for the performers who act out the sick fetishes of the creators.
A waste of time and money.

On August 25 2003, mccorma wrote:

If you are looking for Cirque acrobatics and action, save your money and skip this show. There are a few “moments” but otherwise this show was a major disappointment. If you like Cirque guys wearing G-strings and the girls topless, you will be happy. Otherwise, I can’t recommend this show to anyone looking for the Cirque experience, go see Mystere or “O” instead.

Basically this show involves a guy in drag talking alot on stage, interspersed with some floor dancing and a few other oddities. I could never really understand the point of it and kept waiting for it to “get started”, you know, someone to drop from the ceiling on a trapeze or something. The big “finale” involved the cast groping each other on stage, while the host led the audience in feigned orgasmic sounds. Afterwards, the host went around and asked audience members “did you come??” I didn’t “come” to waste $150 but that’s what happened, and others grousing on the way out evidently agreed. Take your hard earned money elsewhere.

On August 19 2003, Arkarch wrote:

Heralding a trend toward more adult entertainment, Zumanity seriously pushes the envelope in showcasing the full spectrum of human sensuality and sexuality. . Nearly all boundaries are crossed, but with a level of style and fashion and intensity that is incredibly unique.

The Cirque “Acrobatic” skills, while not the focus in this show, do serve to accentuate and heighten the experience. Light comedic moments, including a British comedy troup, keep the show from getting too heavy.

I did find some of the skits / jokes going on a beat too long, and perhaps the show could use a bit more Cirque, but the show stands well on its own, and just from seeing the first show, they have a good start.

Be warned! This is not a traditional show. But if you have an open mind, this is a fun new experience for Las Vegas.